Skip to content
Project NikolaosNescis quid serus vesper vehat

Judaism; ancient Near East

The opening vision of the book of Ezekiel

6th century BCE tradition · Babylonia

An Ethiopian manuscript illumination in strong red, yellow and blue: frontal figures with large outlined eyes, winged forms and wheel shapes arranged symmetrically across the page, with decorative borders.

Vision of Ezekiel, Minas Gospel, Ethiopia, 1455.

Source & rights
What this is
Depiction from within the tradition
Object
Manuscript
Title
Vision of Ezekiel, Minas Gospel
Date
1455
Licence
Public domain
This copy
Rendered at 3840 × 5192 from an original of 9680 × 13088; not otherwise altered.
Retrieved
2026-08-29

Made within the tradition that transmitted the account, though not by a witness to it.

An Ethiopian Christian reading of a text usually reproduced in this archive's other traditions through European engraving. The visual vocabulary is entirely its own, and it is a useful corrective to the assumption that a European picture of a biblical vision is the neutral one.

Source recordLicence

By a canal in Babylon, among a deported population, a priest describes what he saw: a storm from the north, four living creatures each with four faces, wheels beside them that moved without turning, a platform above them, and a figure above that.

What makes the passage unusual is its grammar. It is built almost entirely out of hedges - the appearance of, the likeness of, something like - as though the writer is describing an object for which he has no adequate nouns and is refusing to pretend otherwise. Almost every later depiction of it is more confident than the text.

What the source is

The first chapter of a prophetic book, presenting itself as a first-person account of something seen in exile, at a stated place and in a stated year of a stated reign.

It is among the most heavily illustrated passages in this archive and among the least specific.

The report

No passage reproduced - Project translation in preparation

No passage is printed. Modern English translations are under copyright, and this is exactly the passage where a translator's choices decide the reading - a public-domain rendering would import its own century's assumptions about what the hedges were hedging. A short checked translation from the Hebrew is the intended route.

Why it is in this archive

Because it is the clearest ancient example of a witness declining to name what he is describing. The repeated hedging is the report's most distinctive feature and it is the first thing every later depiction removes.

Set the fifteenth-century Ethiopian illumination beside the seventeenth-century German engraving and the point makes itself: two traditions, two visual vocabularies, the same text, neither derivable from the words alone. What the pictures share is confidence the text does not have.

The passage is also frequently repurposed in modern anomalistic literature. This archive takes no position on that beyond the obvious one: a reading that supplies a specific object where the text supplies only the appearance of a likeness is adding, not decoding.

The words the source uses

Given in the language they were written in, with a plain rendering. None is treated as equivalent to a term from another tradition.

מַרְאֶה
appearance; the look of a thing
The word that carries the passage. It is repeated relentlessly, and it does the opposite of asserting: it marks each description as an approximation of something the writer could not name directly.

How close is the source?

Carried within a religious literary tradition, with the shaping that implies.

  1. 01 · Speaker

    Ezekiel, in the text's own voice

  2. 02 · Transmitted through

    The Hebrew scriptural tradition, its Greek versions and their descendants

  3. 03 · Depicted by

    Illustrators from at least the medieval period onward

    Who had to decide what the hedges meant in order to draw anything at all.

Source gallery

Every image is labelled with what it is evidence for. Select one to see it whole.

Project Nikolaos annotation

Written by this project. Not part of the source, and not a translation of anything in it.

W.W. · Earlier notebook
He says the appearance of, the likeness of, something like, over and over, and then somebody draws it. The drawing is always more certain than the sentence.
Details, provenance and rights
Experiencer state
Awake · Unknown
Reported agency
Multiple personal agencies · Unidentified agency
Locomotion claim
None
Physical trace
Bodily aftereffect reported
Witness or speaker
Ezekiel, in the first person
Recorder / translator
Transmitted through the Hebrew scriptural tradition and its versions
Edition
To be selected from a public-domain critical text of the Hebrew
Rights
Requires a fresh, reviewed translation
Cultural sensitivity
Context needed

Provenance notes

  • Chapter and verse divisions are medieval and are used here only as a citation convention.
  • The dating of the book's composition is a specialist question on which this project has no standing and takes no position.

The Hebrew text is public domain. Modern English translations are not, and none is reproduced or paraphrased here.

No source link: an edition has not yet been selected.