Skip to content
Project NikolaosNescis quid serus vesper vehat

Egyptian Christianity, early monasticism

Life of Antony

4th century · Egypt · Athanasius

An engraving in fine hatched line. A robed, bearded figure is suspended in empty ground, gripped and pulled from every side by a ring of composite creatures with wings, beaks, scales, claws and tails. No landscape and no horizon; the group floats on blank paper.

Martin Schongauer, Saint Anthony Tormented by Demons, c. 1470–74.

Source & rights
What this is
Later depiction
Object
Print
Title
Saint Anthony Tormented by Demons
Creator
Martin Schongauer
Date
c. 1470–74
Held by
The Metropolitan Museum of Art
Licence
CC0
This copy
Hosted at the size published by the source; not altered.
Retrieved
2026-08-28

Made long afterwards. Evidence about the period that produced it, and about nothing else.

Engraved some eleven hundred years after the life it depicts, in a German printmaking tradition with its own repertoire of composite creatures. The blank ground, the symmetry and the anatomical invention are the workshop's, not the fourth century's.

Source recordLicence

In the fourth-century Life of Antony, the Egyptian ascetic repeatedly meets beings the text calls demons. They appear in changing forms, they threaten, they speak, they flatter, and sometimes they announce events happening elsewhere that turn out to be true.

What makes the text remarkable is not the visitations. It is that Antony is shown interrogating them. Who are you? Where have you come from? Does an accurate prediction prove who is speaking? The answer the text gives is no - and a tradition that takes spirits entirely for granted turns out to have built a procedure for distrusting them.

What the source is

A fourth-century account of an Egyptian ascetic, written within a generation or two of its subject and enormously influential on everything monastic that followed it.

It contains a great many reports of apparitions, voices, deceptive appearances, prediction and fear. It also contains something rarer: a set of procedures for deciding whether such an appearance should be believed.

The report

No passage reproduced - Excerpt not published - edition and page not yet verified

The 1892 translation is out of copyright and could be quoted, but this project has not yet checked a specific passage against the printed edition. No excerpt is printed from memory or from an unverified transcription.

Why it is in this archive

This is the flagship entry, and the reason is the opposite of what a casual reader would expect. The interesting thing about this text is not that it is full of spirits. It is that a tradition which takes the existence of spirits for granted does not therefore accept what any given appearance claims about itself.

The questions the text puts to an apparition are recognisably questions about evidence. Who are you? Where have you come from? What follows from your appearance? Does an accurate prediction establish who is speaking - no. Does spectacle establish authority - no. Does fear establish anything at all - no.

It is worth being precise about what this does and does not show. It does not show that the reports are true. It shows that the tradition producing them had a method for distrusting them, which is not what the tradition is usually assumed to have had.

The words the source uses

Given in the language they were written in, with a plain rendering. None is treated as equivalent to a term from another tradition.

angelos
angel
daimon
demon
diakrisis
discernment
The tradition's own word for the practice of testing an appearance rather than accepting it.

How close is the source?

Carried within a religious literary tradition, with the shaping that implies.

  1. 01 · Subject

    Antony

  2. 02 · Written by

    Athanasius, by attribution

    Within living memory of the subject, in a tradition with its own literary conventions.

  3. 03 · Translated by

    H. Ellershaw, for the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers series, 1892

  4. 04 · Digitised by

    Christian Classics Ethereal Library

Source gallery

Every image is labelled with what it is evidence for. Select one to see it whole.

Project Nikolaos annotation

Written by this project. Not part of the source, and not a translation of anything in it.

W.W. · Project note
A tradition that permits the category “spirit” still needs a method for deciding whether the category applies. That sentence is mine, not the text's, and I want the distinction on the record.
Details, provenance and rights
Experiencer state
Ascetic practice · Vigil · Fasting · Awake
Reported agency
Multiple personal agencies · Unidentified agency
Locomotion claim
None
Physical trace
Bodily aftereffect reported
Witness or speaker
Antony, as presented by the work
Recorder / translator
Attributed to Athanasius; English translation in the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers series, 1892
Edition
Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Vol. IV, 1892
Rights
May be reproduced from a verified public-domain edition
Cultural sensitivity
Ordinary historical context

Provenance notes

  • The attribution of the work to Athanasius has been discussed for a long time and is not settled by this entry.
  • The 1892 translation reflects the theological vocabulary of its own century as well as of the fourth.

The 1892 translation is public domain and the digitising library identifies it as such. Rights permit reproduction; the outstanding requirement is editorial, not legal.

Source record